Teams: Difference between revisions

From gdp3
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 155: Line 155:
[[Cooperation]],  
[[Cooperation]],  
[[Guilting]],  
[[Guilting]],  
[[Social Interaction]],
[[Social Roles]],  
[[Social Roles]],  
[[Social Rewards]],  
[[Social Rewards]],  

Revision as of 13:21, 5 August 2015

The one-sentence "definition" that should be in italics.

This pattern is a still a stub.

Examples

Left 4 Dead series Space Alert Battlestar Galactica: The Board Game

Using the pattern

Diegetic Aspects

Interface Aspects

Narration Aspects

to examples: Team-Based Games

Can Modulate

Agents, Avatars, Characters, Conditional Passageways, Instances, Last Man Standing, Massively Multiplayer Online Games, Multiplayer Games, Social Dilemmas, Stimulated Planning, Trick Taking, PvP

Companions

Agents, Characters, Physical Enactment, Player Physical Prowess

Can Be Instantiated By

Enforced Agent Behavior, Factions, Heterogeneous Game Element Ownership, Parties, Roleplaying

Algorithmic Agents together with Companions

Single-Player Games together with Units

Units together with Combos

Can Be Modulated By

AI Players, Altruistic Actions, Arenas, Betrayal, Characteristics, Chat Channels, Collaborative Actions, Drop-In/Drop-Out, Early Leaving Players, Focus Loci, Friendly Fire, Functional Roles, Geospatial Game Widgets, Handles, Internal Conflicts, Internal Rivalry, Invites, Late Arriving Players, Mini-maps, Player Killing, Player-Planned Development, Privileged Abilities, Ragequitting, Reserves, Scores, Sniper Locations, Surrendering, Team Combos, Team Balance, Team Elimination, Team Development, TvT

Game Lobbies in games that have Mediated Gameplay

Potentially Conflicting With

Betrayal, Delayed Reciprocity, Internal Conflicts

Team Balance in games with Privileged Abilities

Consequences

Social Interaction ---

The main consequence of Teams is to create Cooperation (e.g. by requiring separation to maximize Area Control). However, the possibilities for Individual Rewards in Races can give rise to Internal Rivalry and the possibility of Ninja Looting can cause Internal Conflicts. Friendly Fire can be another concern for Cooperation, i.e. if Player Killing of one's own team members is possible through intentional actions or mistakes. Perhaps most problematic of Cooperation, the possibility of Betrayal makes for Complex Gameplay and provides a source for Tension among all members of a Team.

Teams can be pitched against each other in TvT gameplay by applying the design possibilities of Last Man Standing or PvP on Teams. The possibility of succeeding with Eliminate goals of individual members in Teams can lead to complete Team Elimination.

Teams consisting of players create Symbiotic Player Relations and typically cause many patterns related to Social Interaction. Player may take on Social Roles and working together can give rise to Social Rewards and Togetherness regardless of if the Teams actually succeed with their goals. However, failing with achieving goals can lead to Guilting. These pattern can occur even if not all players are actually humans (i.e. if some are AI Players) but the more games are true Multiplayer Games the more Social Skills become important and people can feel that they have achieved Team Strategy Identification before or during gameplay and Team Accomplishments after closures. When FUBAR Enjoyment occurs in these situations, they can become Mutual FUBAR Enjoyment.

Teams can be Abstract Player Constructs if the game state contains information about the Teams besides what members are part of them. In these cases, changes in Characteristics or rewards of Improved or New Abilities causes Team Development. If the Teams consists of Characters the presence of Character Development can do the same, as can the possibility of Gameplay Mastery in Teams consisting of people.

Asymmetric Roles

Team Combos

Team Combos, Team Strategy Identification

Coordination

Shared Resources

Smooth Learning Curves

Coordination, Team Combos, Team Strategy Identification

Team Combos

Coordination, Game-Based Social Statuses

Cooperation, Coordination

Relations

Can Instantiate

Abstract Player Constructs, Cooperation, Guilting, Social Interaction, Social Roles, Social Rewards, Symbiotic Player Relations, Togetherness

Cooperation

Asymmetric Roles

Complex Gameplay, Tension

Team Combos

Team Combos, Team Strategy Identification

Team Development

Coordination

Team Elimination

Shared Resources

Smooth Learning Curves

Internal Rivalry

TvT

Coordination, Team Combos, Team Strategy Identification

Social Skills, Team Accomplishments, Team Strategy Identification

Mutual FUBAR Enjoyment

Internal Conflicts

Friendly Fire

Team Combos

Coordination, Game-Based Social Statuses

Cooperation, Coordination

Can Modulate

Agents, Avatars, Characters, Conditional Passageways, Instances, Last Man Standing, Massively Multiplayer Online Games, Multiplayer Games, Social Dilemmas, Stimulated Planning, Trick Taking, PvP

Companions

Agents, Characters, Physical Enactment, Player Physical Prowess

Can Be Instantiated By

Enforced Agent Behavior, Factions, Heterogeneous Game Element Ownership, Parties, Roleplaying

Algorithmic Agents together with Companions

Single-Player Games together with Units

Units together with Combos

Can Be Modulated By

AI Players, Altruistic Actions, Arenas, Betrayal, Characteristics, Chat Channels, Collaborative Actions, Drop-In/Drop-Out, Early Leaving Players, Focus Loci, Friendly Fire, Functional Roles, Geospatial Game Widgets, Handles, Internal Conflicts, Internal Rivalry, Invites, Late Arriving Players, Mini-maps, Player Killing, Player-Planned Development, Privileged Abilities, Ragequitting, Reserves, Scores, Sniper Locations, Surrendering, Team Combos, Team Balance, Team Elimination, Team Development, TvT

Game Lobbies in games that have Mediated Gameplay

Possible Closure Effects

-

Potentially Conflicting With

Betrayal, Delayed Reciprocity, Internal Conflicts

Team Balance in games with Privileged Abilities

History

An updated version of the pattern Team Play that was part of the original collection in the book Patterns in Game Design<ref name="Bjork & Holopainen 2004"/>.

References

<references> <ref name="Bjork & Holopainen 2004">Björk, S. & Holopainen, J. (2004) Patterns in Game Design. Charles River Media. ISBN1-58450-354-8.</ref> </references>

Acknowledgements

-