Closure Points: Difference between revisions

From gdp3
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 25: Line 25:


== Relations ==
== Relations ==
[[Irreversible Events]]
[[Staries]]
[[Higher-Level Closures as Gameplay Progresses]]
[[Higher-Level Closures as Gameplay Progresses]]
[[Levels]]
[[Levels]]
Line 34: Line 32:
[[Save Points]]
[[Save Points]]


Instantiates: Limited Foresight
Instantiates: [[Limited Foresight]]


Modulates: [[Predictable Consequences]], [[Narration Structures]]
Modulates: [[Predictable Consequences]], [[Narration Structures]]
Line 54: Line 52:


=== Can Be Instantiated By ===
=== Can Be Instantiated By ===
[[Irreversible Events]],
[[Quests]]
[[Quests]]



Revision as of 10:51, 7 July 2016

The one-sentence "definition" that should be in italics.

This pattern is a still a stub.

Examples

Games that provide levels also provide Closure Points. A few examples of the many games that does this include Candy Crush Saga, Doom, Staries, Pac-Man, and Tetris.

Using the pattern

Diegetic Aspects

Interface Aspects

Narration Aspects

Consequences

Relations

Higher-Level Closures as Gameplay Progresses Levels Excluding Goals Finale Levels Downtime Save Points

Instantiates: Limited Foresight

Modulates: Predictable Consequences, Narration Structures

Instantiated by: Tournaments, Transfer of Control

Modulated by: Committed Goals

Potentially conflicting with: Never Ending Stories


Can Instantiate

Value of Effort

with ...

Can Modulate

-

Can Be Instantiated By

Irreversible Events, Quests

Can Be Modulated By

-

Possible Closure Effects

-

Potentially Conflicting With

-

History

An updated version of the pattern Closure Points that was part of the original collection in the book Patterns in Game Design<ref name="Bjork & Holopainen 2004"/>.

References

<references> <ref name="Bjork & Holopainen 2004">Björk, S. & Holopainen, J. (2004) Patterns in Game Design. Charles River Media. ISBN1-58450-354-8.</ref> </references>

Acknowledgements

-